Submitted by one of our readers

Have you ever wondered why aging man engage in heavily sexually loaded discourse as they attempt to add weight to their arguments, or even better, how a ‘satanic orgy’ would look like?

Pretty hot we would guess, but don’t look at us for such answers.

However, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the PN’s Malta Żagħżugħa!

The PN is desperately trying to gain momentum by presenting itself as fresh and reformed, but it keeps getting entangled in Freudian slips that reveal its true intentions. Meanwhile, it parades its relics in front of podiums, spewing hatred at those it perceives as obstacles to its ultimate goals, and the divine rights that were democratically taken away from them by the Maltese people.

One of the biggest mistakes the Labour Party can, or is already making, is to regard the PN as a bunch of disjointed individuals without a clear plan. They do have a plan, but it is, and will remain hidden. A wolf in a sheep’s skin will never disclose its identity or intentions until it’s too late.

And it’s not just a matter of beef that these hidden hands are after. Prominent PN members have already positioned themselves strategically within arm’s reach of multimillion-euro ventures. While we refrain from using satanic or sexual terminology, we certainly cannot refer to any of this in holy terms.

On the other hand, the government is harshly criticised when it is seen to err in governance, and this is both healthy and necessary. Moreover, it is the direct result of the sweeping reforms introduced by the Abela administration. Malta now has institutions that independently investigate everything, from the most trivial matters to the most serious allegations, holding the government in check and serving as a vehicle for the continuous improvement of standards.

But isn’t it important for the opposition to come clean on its real intentions? Instead of hiding behind experts using heavy language, it should start by explaining some basic aspects of good governance. For example, are opposition MPs already in business or being paid by companies with very strong interests in Government contracts? Is the opposition leader comfortable with how tangled some of his closest colleagues are with big business?

Perhaps they should get an allegedly seasoned economist to give them a thorough analysis.